How did Persia/Iran escape colonisation during the age of imperialism?’

Reading Time: 8 minutes

During the age of imperialism, very few nations avoided colonisation by a major European power without possessing significant regional strength. In the Middle East, Persia was the sole exception. It maintained its sovereignty throughout the 19th and 20th centuries.

This is especially miraculous, considering Persia faced enormous internal challenges. The country dealt with regional instability caused by autonomous tribes like the Qashqai, Bakhtiari, and Turkmen, an agrarian economy which suffered from limited industrialisation and the decline of the Silk Road due to European maritime dominance. Its military was also severely underfunded. 

Yet, despite these internal problems, Persia remained independent—an anomaly in an era defined by aggressive imperial expansion.

Fig. 1. Map of Persia in 1900 (including the red stripes)

Beyond internal instability, Persia faced the threat of three major European powers on its borders: the Ottoman Empire to the west, the Russian Empire to the north, and the British Empire to the southeast. Historically, the Ottomans were Persia’s main rival. Over the past three centuries, both empires clashed over key territories like Iraq and Azerbaijan. However, by the 19th century, the Ottoman Empire was a shadow of its former self. It was burdened by internal revolts and European encroachment. The Serbian Revolution (1804–1817) and the Greek War of Independence (1821–1830) saw Balkan territories break away and the independence of Romania, Serbia, and Montenegro occurred.

Financially, the Ottomans collapsed. The 1875 debt crisis that placed them under European economic control further weakened its ability to project power. Militarily and economically fragile, they could no longer threaten Persia during the period of the 19th and early 20th centuries.

 By the early 19th century, Russia had established itself as a formidable threat to Persia. It had expanded southward into the Caucasus and Kazakhstan, a catalyst for two major conflicts, the Russo-Persian Wars of 1804–1813 and 1826–1828.

Both wars resulted in significant Persian territorial losses. The Treaty of Gulistan (1813) forced Persia to cede Dagestan and most of the Caucasus to the Russians, including the industrialised cities of Baku and Derbent. The Treaty of Turkmenchay (1828) stripped Persia of Nakhichevan and the remainder of Armenia ending its centuries-long influence in the Caucasus.

These treaties additionally came with harsh terms.  The latter treaty imposed a staggering indemnity of 20 million silver rubles which bankrupted the Qajar treasury. Therefore granting Russian merchants exclusive trading privileges, including dramatically reduced tariffs. This further damaged Persia’s domestic economy by flooding its markets with Russian goods. Furthermore, Russia gained extraterritorial rights, exempting its citizens from Persian law, and barred Persia from stationing warships in the Caspian. Russian naval dominance became ensured.

The combined effect of these terms, while stopping short of colonisation, reduced Persia to a semi-dependent state under Russian economic and political influence.

Fig. 2. Map of Losses to the Russian Empire during the period of 1804-1828

By the mid-19th century, Britain became deeply involved in Persia’s political and economic affairs. The British had consolidated power in India and feared Russian expansion. An Anglo-Russian rivalry, known as the Great Game.

The British East India Company’s conquest of Sindh (1843) and Punjab (1849) brought British influence directly to Persia’s eastern frontier, increasing the country’s importance as a buffer state between the two empires. British anxieties over Russian-Persian influence in Afghanistan culminated in the First Anglo-Afghan War (1839–1842). Although it was a disastrous military intervention, it reinforced Britain’s determination to curtail Persian ambitions.

This policy became evident in the Anglo-Persian War (1856–1857), when Britain swiftly retaliated against Persia’s attempt to reclaim Herat. A successful naval blockade and inland campaign forced Persia to sign the Treaty of Paris (1857), renouncing claims to Herat and recognising Afghanistan as a British-aligned state.

Fig. 3. Map of lands lost to both Russia and Britain by Persia in the 19th Century

Beyond military pressure, Britain expanded its economic and infrastructural presence in Persia. The Anglo-Persian Telegraph Agreement (1863) linked India to Europe via Persia, allowing Britain to monitor Russian activities more effectively.

British economic control was strengthened with the Reuter Concession (1872) which granted British businessman Baron Julius de Reuter significant control over Persian infrastructural projects. Although it was later revoked due to Russian and domestic opposition, it highlighted Britain’s growing involvement.

Following the important Persian discovery of oil, the 1901 D’Arcy Concession granted British investors a 60-year monopoly on Persian oil exploration, culminating in the formation of the Anglo-Persian Oil Company—modern-day BP—in 1908.

This oil became vital to Britain’s global strategy, as the British Royal Navy transitioned from coal to oil-powered ships, further entrenching British economic and strategic influence. Investments in non-oil sectors, such as railways and telecommunications, further tied Persia to Britain’s imperial network, ensuring that while Persia remained politically independent, its economy was increasingly shaped by British interests.

Fig. 4. Abadan Refinery built by the APOC in the 1910s              

Fig. 5. William Knox D’Arcy

By the mid-19th century, Persia had come to terms with its military inferiority after suffering defeats to both Russia and Britain. Thus, there were efforts to modernise the Persian military, including the establishment of the Dār al-Fonūn Military and Technical Academy in 1851 to train officers. However, British and Russian opposition prevented significant military growth, and internal resistance from conservative Qajar elites further limited reforms. Recognising that direct military confrontation was futile in maintaining their independence, Persia turned to diplomacy, skilfully playing Britain and Russia against each other in order to maintain its sovereignty.

This strategy was evident during the Napoleonic Wars (1803–1815), when Persia initially allied with France through the Treaty of Finkenstein (1807), hoping to use French support against Russia. However, when Napoleon shifted his alliance to Russia in the Treaty of Tilsit (1807), Persia pivoted towards Britain.

Similarly, during the Greek War of Independence (1821–1830), Persia benefited indirectly as Britain focused on supporting the Ottoman Empire against Russia, preventing further Russian advances into Persian territory. The Crimean War (1853–1856) provided another opportunity: with Britain and France engaged against Russia, Persia sought to reassert control over Herat in 1856, though this ultimately led to war with Britain. It also led to the Treaty of Paris (1857), which forced Persia to withdraw from Afghanistan. This pattern of leveraging Anglo-Russian tensions continued into the late 19th century too.

 In 1907, the Anglo-Russian Convention was signed between the British and Russian Empires, expanding their spheres of influence in Persia, Afghanistan, and Tibet. In Persia, the Convention divided the nation into three distinct zones. The northern region, encompassing cities like Tabriz and Mashhad, fell under Russian influence. The southeastern area, including Sistan and Baluchistan, was designated for British influence. A neutral zone was created in the centre, covering parts of Isfahan and Yazd, where both powers agreed not to interfere.

Fig. 6. Separation of Persia into three regions during the Anglo-Russian Convention of 1907

Despite the erosion of Persian self-governance, the Convention inadvertently served as a protective mechanism against full-scale colonisation. The mutual distrust between Britain and Russia ensured that neither power could unilaterally dominate Persia without provoking the other. Furthermore, both empires recognised the strategic importance of Persia as a buffer state, preventing direct confrontation between their respective colonial holdings.

Both World Wars further threatened Persia’s sovereignty. In 1914, the Ottoman Empire invaded northwestern Persia, using it as a base for operations against Russia in the Caucasus. In response, Russian forces occupied Persian Azerbaijan, clashing with Ottoman-backed Kurdish and Azerbaijani militias. Meanwhile, the British, seeking to protect Anglo-Persian Oil Company interests (established in 1908), stationed troops in the south. Persia’s fragmented political landscape and weak military left it unable to resist.

The 1917 Russian Revolution shifted the balance forcing Bolshevik forces to withdraw. Britain sought to exploit this power vacuum through the 1919 Anglo-Persian Agreement, which aimed to establish Persia as a British protectorate. However, fierce nationalist opposition, led by Hassan Modarres and Mohammad Mossadegh, along with Soviet, French, and American pressure led to the agreement’s rejection in 1921.

World War II again left Persia vulnerable to foreign powers. By 1941, Reza Shah’s modernisation efforts had strengthened central authority, but he refused to expel German engineers. Britain and the USSR had become severely alarmed by this. Keen to deter any future Persian oil being directed towards Germany and to create an alternate supply route for the Eastern front, they invaded the country on the 25th August of that year. Persia, militarily outmatched, surrendered within six days (August 31st, 1941), preventing prolonged resistance that might have led to full partition, as seen in Poland in 1939.

Instead, the Allies forced Reza Shah to abdicate in favour of his son, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, ensuring Persia remained under indirect control rather than outright occupation. The 1942 Tripartite Treaty of Alliance formalised Iran’s role in the Allied war effort while guaranteeing its territorial integrity. Despite Stalin’s desire to continue occupying Persia after the war, U.S. diplomatic pressure ensured Iran remained independent from Soviet control as both sides wanted to avoid potential future civil wars in the region.

Fig. 7. Map of Soviet and British occupation of Iran during World War Two

In conclusion, Persia managed to evade colonisation through a realisation that many nations of the time failed to understand: it could not effectively resist an invasion by a major power. As a result, Persia sought to balance the influences of both Russia and Britain in the region, willingly conceding key assets such as its oil rights or industries to foreign powers to avoid a full-scale invasion.

NB: Persia became known as Iran after 1935. As a result, Persia is referred to as Iran in the latter part of the essay.

Masters, Bruce, “The Treaties of Erzurum (1823 and 1848) and the Changing Status of Iranians in the Ottoman Empire,” Iranian Studies, 1991. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaties_of_Erzurum

Ateş, Sabri, Ottoman-Iranian Borderlands: Making a Boundary, 1843-1914, Cambridge University Press, 2013. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaties_of_Erzurum

Tucker, Spencer C. (ed.), A Global Chronology of Conflict: From the Ancient World to the Modern Middle, Vol. III, ABC-CLIO, 2010. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaties_of_Erzurum

“The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica,” “Decline of the Ottoman Empire,” Encyclopaedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/summary/Decline-of-the-Ottoman-Empire

Reynolds, Michael A., “Six Reasons Why the Ottoman Empire Fell,” HISTORY, 2018. https://www.history.com/news/ottoman-empire-fall

Amanat, Abbas, Iran: A Modern History, Yale University Press, 2017. https://yalebooks.yale.edu/book/9780300248937/iran

Katouzian, Homa, The Persians: Ancient, Medieval, and Modern Iran, Yale University Press, 2009. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/persians/

Floor, Willem, The Economy of Iran, 1800-1914, I.B. Tauris, 2000. https://www.bloomsbury.com/us/economy-of-iran-18001914-9781860643046/

The Cambridge History of Iran, Vol. 7, Cambridge University Press.

https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/cambridge-history-of-iran

“Encyclopaedia Iranica,” Entry on Russo-Persian Relations. https://iranicaonline.org/articles/russia-iii-relations-with-persia

“Treaty of Gulistan (1813),” Wikisource. https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Treaty_of_Gulistan

“Treaty of Turkmenchay (1828),” Wikisource. https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Treaty_of_Turkmenchay

“Russo-Persian Wars,” Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russo-Persian_Wars

FROMKIN, David, The Great Game in Asia, Knopf, 1980. https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/56492/the-great-game-by-peter-hopkirk/

Volodarsky, Mikhail, Persia and the Great Powers, 1856-1869, Routledge, 1995. https://www.routledge.com/Persia-and-the-Great-Powers-1856-1869/Volodarsky/p/book/9780367283286

“Anglo-Persian War (1856–1857),” Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anglo-Persian_War

“Treaty of Paris (1857),” Wikisource. https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Treaty_of_Paris_(1857)

Hopkirk, Peter, The Great Game: The Struggle for Empire in Central Asia, John Murray, 1990. https://www.harpercollins.com/products/the-great-game-peter-hopkirk

Ferrier, R.W., Britain and Persia 1797-1921: A Study in Imperialism, Oil and Diplomacy, Routledge, 1982. https://www.routledge.com/Britain-and-Persia-1797-1921-A-Study-in-Imperialism-Oil-and-Diplomacy/Ferrier/p/book/9781138926503

“The British Empire and Persia,” Encyclopaedia Iranica. https://iranicaonline.org/articles/great-britain-ii-relations-with-persia

Encyclopaedia Iranica, “Anglo-Persian Oil Company,” https://iranicaonline.org/articles/anglo-persian-oil-company

Wikipedia, “Abadan Refinery,” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abadan_Refinery

Farnworth, Roger, “Railways in Iran – Part 11 – Anglo-Persian Oil Company Ltd.,” https://rogerfarnworth.com/2020/11/19/railways-in-iran-part-11-anglo-persian-oil-company-ltd/

Iran Front Page, “Abadan Oil Refinery’s Role In Iran History,” https://ifpnews.com/abadan-oil-refinerys-role-in-iran-history/

Shana, “Abadan Oil Refinery’s Role in Iran History,” https://en.shana.ir/news/259459/Abadan-Oil-Refinery-s-Role-in-Iran-History

Khwarizmi Technology Development Company, “Abadan Oil Refining Company,” https://khwarizmico.com/en/customers/refinery/abadan-oil-refining-company/

Cambridge University Press, ““Rich Fields in Persia”: Parsi Capital and the Origins of Economic Development in Pahlavi Iran, 1925–1941,” https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/iranian-studies/article/rich-fields-in-persia-parsi-capital-and-the-origins-of-economic-development-in-pahlavi-iran-19251941/786C0BCAA5DAA6F09597F98E4000BBCC

Wikipedia, “Anglo-Persian Oil Company,” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anglo-Persian_Oil_Company

The Lion and the Sun, “Anglo Persian Oil Company: How British Oil Ambitions Shaped Iran,” https://thelionandthesun.org/630/anglo-persian-oil-company-in-iran/

Twelve Year History, “The Abadan Oil Refinery Begins,” https://www.twelveyearhistory.com/post/the-abadan-oil-refinery-1913-to-1920

Encyclopaedia Iranica, “Oil Agreements in Iran,” https://iranicaonline.org/articles/oil-agreements-in-iran

Wikiwand, “Abadan Refinery,” https://www.wikiwand.com/en/articles/Abadan_Refinery

Volodarsky, Mikhail, Persia and the Great Powers, 1856–1869, Cambridge University Press, 1980. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/persia-and-the-great-powers-18561869/

Hopkirk, Peter, The Great Game: On Secret Service in High Asia, John Murray, 1990. https://www.bloomsbury.com/us/great-game-9781568360225/

Ramazani, R. K., Iran Between Two Empires: Russia and Britain in Persia, 1860–1914, Princeton University Press, 1966. https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691649813/iran-between-two-empires

Amanat, Abbas, Iran: A Modern History, Yale University Press, 2017. https://yalebooks.yale.edu/book/9780300248937/iran

Katouzian, Homa, The Persians: Ancient, Medieval, and Modern Iran, Yale University Press, 2009. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/persians/

Keddie, Nikki R., Qajar Iran and the Rise of Reza Khan, 1796–1925, University of California Press, 1999. https://www.ucpress.edu/book/9780520214464/qajar-iran-and-the-rise-of-reza-khan

Floor, Willem, The Economy of Iran, 1800–1914, I.B. Tauris, 2000. https://www.bloomsbury.com/us/economy-of-iran-18001914-9781860643046/

“Encyclopaedia Iranica,” Russo-Persian Relations. https://iranicaonline.org/articles/russia-iii-relations-with-persia

“Treaty of Paris (1857),” Wikisource. https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Treaty_of_Paris_(1857)

“Treaty of Turkmenchay (1828),” Wikisource. https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Treaty_of_Turkmenchay

Encyclopaedia Iranica, “Anglo-Russian Convention of 1907,”

https://iranicaonline.org/articles/anglo-russian-convention-of-1907-an-agreement-relating-to-persia-afghanistan-and-tibet

Wikipedia, “Anglo-Russian Convention,” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anglo-Russian_Convention

Avalon Project, “The Anglo-Russian Entente – 1907,” https://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/angrusen.asp

Wikisource, “Anglo-Russian Convention,” https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Anglo-Russian_Convention

Churchill, Rogers Platt, The Anglo-Russian Convention of 1907, https://archive.org/details/anglorussianconv0000chur

Kazemzadeh, Firuz, Russia and Britain in Persia, 1864–1914: A Study in Imperialism, Yale University Press, 1968. https://yalebooks.yale.edu/book/9780300015682/russia-and-britain-in-persia-1864-1914/

Siegel, Jennifer, Endgame: Britain, Russia, and the Final Struggle for Central Asia, I.B. Tauris, 2002. https://www.bloomsbury.com/us/endgame-9781784537911/

White, John Albert, Transition to Global Rivalry: Alliance Diplomacy and the Quadruple Entente, 1895–1907, Cambridge University Press, 1995. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/transition-to-global-rivalry/

Williams, Beryl J., “The Strategic Background to the Anglo-Russian Entente of August 1907,” Historical Journal, 1966. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2638473

Shuster, W. Morgan, The Strangling of Persia: A Story of European Diplomacy and Oriental Intrigue, 1912. https://archive.org/details/stranglingofpers00shusuoft

Jelavich, Barbara, St. Petersburg and Moscow: Tsarist and Soviet Foreign Policy, 1814–1974, Indiana University Press, 1974. https://iupress.org/9780253205526/st-petersburg-and-moscow/

Langer, William L., “Russia, the Straits Question, and the European Powers, 1904–8,” The English Historical Review, 1929. https://academic.oup.com/ehr/article-abstract/44/176/525/358861

Palmer, A. W., “The Anglo-Russian Entente,” History Today, 1957. https://www.historytoday.com/archive/anglo-russian-entente

Axworthy, Michael, A History of Iran: Empire of the Mind, https://www.basicbooks.com/titles/michael-axworthy/a-history-of-iran/9780465098771/

Amanat, Abbas, Iran: A Modern History, https://yalebooks.yale.edu/book/9780300248937/iran/

Majd, Mohammad Gholi, Iran in World War II: The Bridge to Victory and a Land of Famine, https://rowman.com/ISBN/9780761822653/Iran-in-World-War-II-The-Bridge-to-Victory-and-a-Land-of-Famine

Volodarsky, Mikhail, Persia and the Great Powers, 1856-1869, https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/persia-and-the-great-powers-18561869/768679849E5A3A14B461B9A2A1A25E5E

“Anglo-Soviet Invasion of Iran”, Wikipedia,

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anglo-Soviet_invasion_of_Iran

“Tripartite Treaty of Alliance (1942)”, Encyclopedia Iranica, http://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/tripartite-treaty

Ward, Steven R., Immortal: A Military History of Iran and Its Armed Forces, https://press.georgetown.edu/Book/Immortal

Rezun, Miron, The Soviet Union and Iran: Soviet Policy in Iran from the Beginnings of the Pahlavi Dynasty,

https://www.routledge.com/The-Soviet-Union-and-Iran-Soviet-Policy-in-Iran-from-the-Beginnings-of-the/Rezun/p/book/9780367295938